| S.T.A.G.E. said:
People who call Pokemon a fad after the duration of its success are essentially clueless. Please debate the precise nature of the Move. I would love to see you try. The Kinect is not in its infancy...its trying to prove a fallacy....that a camera device in the current time can control a game in costricted space without a peripheral device. Sony knew this well before the Kinect ever came out because they started the trend, turned down the makers of the Kinect on their tech because it was useless, and then went on to evolve the tech to create a more meaningful experience on core games. In the end it was pointless because they didnt create games for such great tech. Dumb move Sony....very dumb. Its just like the Vita...which is the best technical handheld money can buy but has no proper software. Who gives a crap if there are no games? |
@bold. And you are doing the very same with the Wii. The system sold in its lifetime very well so long as it was supported with games.
http://www.vgchartz.com/tools/hw_date.php (Choose only Wii, choose Date = All)
I've played enough games with the Wiimotion+ (Resort, Skyward Sword) to tell you that it work precisely. It has its kinks but they are always improving their software wrappers around the hardware. Each game makes a varied accurate use of the technology. I've never used move so I won't judge on hands-on experience. I'm pretty sure it's debatable but fair enough since you want to see me try, I won't.
Your kinect talk is thin air. They have Fable Journey (which employed hands-free gaming), Kinect Adventures (which sold 20m units I might add) and many other high-selling games which make use of the tech. So I'm sorry if the market highly disagrees with you.
