Cold-Flipper said:
You can't really compare newer games with sales of older games because popularity changes and different factors like who developed the game certainly makes a difference. I'm just saying if Retro made a Star Fox and Metroid on Wii U, my money would be on Star Fox to sell more. Certain series I guess are roughly even, and Pikmin is also still debatable but we shall see with Pikmin 3. Either way, Metroid still gets outsold by:
I would still classify as pretty low on the totem pole. To me, nearly every game on Wii U so far could've been a Wii game in terms of how core they are. With that said, I'm fine with that since I liked the Wii. They could be a bit more core though I guess. Does Nintendo really need to innovate like the DS or Wii? To me the games still look very Nintendo. Have yet to play them though so I can't judge.
|
I'm certainly not going to argue that Metroid is anywhere near the top of the list, especially in sales. But the issue here is that the list of games Nintendo develops and/or publishes is huge, so compared to the average Nintendo published title, yes, it sells fairly well.
And considering that Nintendo can usually only release one of the titles per series you mentioned every three years without said series going stale (except for Mario, which Nintendo apparently believes can never go stale), Metroid is consistently up there as one of those series that gets kicked around a lot even though it doesn't sell way up there with some other series. The fact that it has an incredibly dedicated fan base, as well being one of the few "mature" series Nintendo has, gives it a sense of lasting impact and importance that most series with its sales wouldn't.
So I think saying it's "low on the totem pole" is selling it short.









