| toadslayer72 said: I understood it as I can play my game WITH one person in my share family of 10 simultaneously and the the other 9 in my family have access to the rest of my library but only one of them at a time can play any game I have. @ superchunk, you seem stone cold certain that this isn't the case, are we all guilty of looking at the same thing and seeing what we want? I ask because you seem like an intelligent enough person as do J_Allard and starcraft but you guys are seeing it way different. There is a big difference between not being able to play simultaneously with one person and being able to do so. |
It simply makes no sense to allow you to share, simultaneously, a single game on separate consoles.
Basically that is MS allowing limited piracy as more than one person has full rights to the game at the same time. Its like you gave one floating copy.
I don't see any publisher accepting this.
It also directly contradicts what the OP final tweet states/implies.
Has MS made this too confusing at first? yes. But, I feel those of you thinking this is true will be very upset come November. (or earlier as this is finally clarified at some point my an MS executive vs a random support person on twitter)







