HoloDust said:
Rogerioandrade said: Seriously... are people still worried about comparing graphics? C´mon... we´re not in the 90´s anymore. Time to update concepts. We all know that graphics alone can´t do a decent game. A game basically is made of art style, gameplay, soundtrack, sound effects, level design. A great art style make for visuals much more than realistic graphics. We´re playing games, not watching movies. People who judge games or systems only by their graphics simply are not real gamers. |
True - that's why I was excited when I saw MGS V footage and after watching first gameplay vid, though I'm not a big fan of that IP, inFamous: Second Son...on the other hand, X did very little for me...but as I said earlier, different strokes for different folks when it comes to preferences, them being highly subjective. On the other, technical level of visuals....not so subjective really, and I believe that this thread is made, at least from its title, about "X's Graphics".
|
I really dont get why people keep talking about X being impressive techincally, it has a nice art but thats about it, oh and some nice draw distance, yet image quality, lighting, poly count, textures and AA are all below top tier current gen.