By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
marc on 04 June 2007
Edit Thread
omgwtfbbq said:

a.l.e.x59 said:
I don't care what any of you say. You could say that the Xbox 360 could be better than the Playstation 3 in any department, except for one thing. Blu-Ray is far superior than HD-DVD. You will always get a finer picture with Blu-Ray, and that's a fact! By the way, since Sony wanted their Playstation 3 to be the best gaming console ever, why couldn't they have looked at the Xbox 360 specifications, and make sure that the Playstation 3 specifications were stronger in every single department?

I don't know where you et your "facts" from.

Blu-Ray and HD-DVD both use the exact same codec. The picture quality is almost identical. There is much debate over which has better picture quality but there are no "facts" saying blu-ray or HD-DVD have higher picture quality.

 


I do believe you are correct. As I understand it, they do indeed use the same codec so in terms of movies, neither has any kind of advantage unless the BR uses higher bitrates. This is of course possible given the roomier discs but as far as I know, they use the same settings. So if someone does see a better picture, it is not because of the format. It is probably because of the player itself.

Oh also, back then I remember that they did look at the 360 specs but Sony had already selected the hardware they were going to use in the PS3 before the 360 specs were finalized. They also believed that their cell processors would be superior but they had a lot of trouble manufacturing them and I believe they had to scale back a bit on them. Lastly, as it turns out, the cell processor really wasnt that great of a engineering leap.