By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thekitchensink said:
Game_boy said:
NJ5 said:
@Game_boy: Do you realize that you can say the same, if not worse, about Sony with the PS3? They're also subsidizing it with the profits from their other divisions, and they're several billions in the hole already.

Yes, I hate PS3's tactics too, but Microsoft's are on a far larger scale (PS was profitable intermittently) and consumers suffer more (Halo/Rare acquisitions; at least Sony never did that).


(Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I don't have time to read the whole topic.)

Square? They didn't buy them outright, but they have 10% of them, which is quite a sizeable chunk. Conssidering that Square used to be big Nintendo supporters, I'd say it's the same thing (though it's not as dominant, since Square still makes the odd small game for Nintendo).

 

@Mirson: So? It's called your opinion. I could say "Wii offers AAA games as well as innovative input methods and the option to purchase a wide variety of classic games."


*looks at SE's DS line up*

DQIX is an "odd small game"? SE supports whoever is dominating Japan. Sony's 10% ownership has little sway over the company, aside from MAYBE giving Sony extra leeway to BUY exclusivity deals now that the ps3 is getting it's ass whooped by the Wii.