By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Max King of the Wild said:
DucksUnlimited said:

the logical burden of proof is on the claimant to provide sufficient evidence. You should not accept a claim, good or bad, until it has been fully supported.

Why thank you, but I think you are still confused... What is the claim? The claim is Sony will have DRM... So yes, I agree... we should accept a claim until it has been fully supported... So please, anyone care to support this claim?

(Check mate)


What? I said you should not accept a claim without support. That includes both the claim that Sony will have DRM and the claim that Sony will not have DRM. The logical thing to do is accept that we don't know yet because Sony has not provided sufficient evidence either way. That's been the position I've been demonstrating in every one of my thread posts. Clearly you're the only one here who's confused. I would lay off the chess metaphors and focus more on knowing the actual position of the person you're replying to. The regurgitated strawmannning is getting a little old.