| Kasz216 said: No it isn't. That's not logical. That's just stupid. That's why the Congressional Budget Office is useless. Besides logically one must consider the source, what you are ignoring is the fact that corporations constantly mislead and misdirect. They are like poltiicians. They only fully tell the truth when being extremely direct, and answering every follow up question available. Whenever there is wiggleroom they are concealing something, even if it's just a possibility to go that route. To take PR statements at face value is... just silly, and you are better then that. Or do you believe everything Obama is saying about the NSA scandal? There is no proof available to not believe him. Outside the fact that fact that his statements have been openended and evasive. Corporations, polticians it's all the same, it's all about reading between the lines until someone gets them in a room and throughly grills them, or they put up or shut up. |
I suggest you take a logic course then. If the argument is ambigous or a premise isn't explicitly specified then you must give it the benefit of the doubt and assume the best case scenarios of the argument is what is being said.
