By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
In fact, logic dictates the complete opposite . that if something is not stated explicitly then you need to interpret whats been said in the best situation until specified. Basically give them the benefit of the doubt. I refrence you to The Power of Logic chapter 7 (i believe)

No it isn't.  That's not logical.  That's just stupid.  That's why the Congressional Budget Office is useless.

Your ignoring the fact that corporations constantly mislead and misdirect. 

They are like poltiicians.  They only fully tell the truth when being extremely direct, and answering every follow up question available.

Whenever there is wiggleroom they are concealing something, even if it's just a possibility to go that route.

 

To take PR statements at face value is... just silly, and you are better then that.

Or do you believe everything Obama is saying about the NSA scandal?  There is no proof available to not believe him.   Outside the fact that fact that his statements have been openended and evasive.

Corporations, polticians it's all the same, it's all about reading between the lines until someone gets them in a room and throughly grills them, or they put up or shut up.

I was going to write a similar response, so thank you for saving me the trouble.

To add to what you said, the logical burden of proof is on the claimant to provide sufficient evidence. You should not accept a claim, good or bad, until it has been fully supported. Somebody who uses the word "logic" as much as he does should be aware of this. Assuming that Sony won't implement DRM in some fashion is as bad as assuming they will at this point. The logical thing to do, for now, is admit that we just don't know.