walsufnir said:
It's not the apu, it is the whole chip with APU, memory controller, move units and esram. Of course this is more expensive. |
All right, the whole chip.
But it's the same problem - how can something be "of course more expensive" and at the same time weaker than the competition?
What's the benefit of this design decision? That the machine will be able to communicate faster with separate OPs (which makes it fast to switch between different programs, like gaming, Kinect, Skype, TV etc)? That's the only argument I've heard so far.







