| Dunban67 said: re:And of course there are other costs like marketing, R&D, etc that also increase the final price. For instance, WiiU's BOM was rumored to be $180, the console is sold for $300 and Nintendo loses money on each one. I understand/agree re the other cost involved- I imagine Sony and MSFT will be selling at a loss too- but regardless of cost for any of the consoles, don t you think the Wii U should be at least $100 cheaper than the msft/sony consoles to be competitive from a valuation standpoint? |
Yes, if both the PS4/Xbone are launched at $400, then the WiiU needs to be $300 to be competitive. And I mean the Premium model.
| TheLastStarFighter said: Of course AMD could be taking big losses at launch - and this could be behind NVidia's lack of interest - but I doubt it. |
AMD won't take any losses for other Co. They will make the APUs and they will sell them for a profit. If Sony and MSoft are ready to sell their machines with a loss it's their problem, not AMD's one.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







