miz1q2w3e said:
RolStoppable said:
NintendoPie said:
That was supposed to be taken as a joke... SPM wasn't bad either, it just wasn't good. There, that makes perfect sense.
I think the main thing that people don't seem to get is that maybe, just maybe, Nintendo wanted to take the Paper Mario series in a different direction. And that's a mission they obviously succeded in. Maybe this is the samething that happened to Pokemon; early adopters of the series just can't understand why the series had to change, whilst the "newer" adopters enjoy the change.
|
Not sure about that success. Keeping Paper Mario as the simple, straightforward RPG with enough depth could have led to better sales and certainly a more solid fanbase for future titles.
Also, Pokémon changed? That has to be a joke.
|
Sad thing is they'll probably look at the sales and think "people love this, let's continue". I may not like it personally, but the series has increased in sales with SPM, and even more with PM:SS. |
Now that's a scary thought. If that were to be the case, then sadly I'd have to ditch the PM franchise and go with Mario & Luigi only from now on to get my Mario RPG fix. Surely that wont happen though, right Nintendo... right?
