KylieDog said:
walsufnir said:
KylieDog said:
NobleTeam360 said: 400-500 Xbox that has multiple uses or 1500 to 2000 TV with limited function? I'll take the Xbox. |
Thing is, the TV will work without an Xbox, the Xbox won't work without a TV.
It is more realistic someone who needs a TV will go buy this TV than go buy one without that function and then buy a XBone.
|
Thing is, this TV is the premium line of Samsung TVs which are quite expensive in contrast to the common TVs they sell. The price difference is easily a Xbox One which has more functions and a good, working motion-control-solution. The Samsung-solution is not on par with MS' solution.
|
...and you really think people want an extra huge box sitting in their living room, when they going to need their cable box still. They will pay for the real all in ONE device.
|
Exactly, which was my point about the Samsung TV. If Smart TV's already have Netflix and Hulu and now they can do what Kinect does with moving the screen and speaking to the TV, the job is majorly done. Marcus Beer already debunked that Xbone is not an all in one device.