Multimedialover said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Multimedialover said:
Was talking to a guy when Kinect first came out. He had used an Eyetoy through a PC to try and do certain things in programs. He LOL'd at people claiming it was like Kinect. It clearly isnt even the same. A running game for example just looked at he tips of your arms when it was up or down to make th character run.
Whre with Kinect its possible to mimic your own runnin style. One is loking at you and your movements the other makes you believe thats what it its doing.
|
Whoever told you the Eyetoy only tracked the head and shoulders was a moron. It reads from head to feet, you just needed to stand away while it scanned your body. All this six years before the Kinect. Around this time Sony had already turned down Primesense who eventually moved onto MS and gave them their tech to make the Kinect. Sony made their own inhouse tech and came to the conclusion that Standard Eyetoy/Kinect-like games were only good for "mini-game" like experience and lacked depth no matter how well it scans your body and recognizes your movement. Same experience more powerful and recognition tech in the camera a generation later. More powerful tech is to be expected a gen later and theres still very little thats different.
The only thing Sony was impressed about with the Kinect was its sales, not its tech. They know its not going any further than it already has because they've been there done that and figured out how to work camera games. Problem is just like the Vita, the tech is there and its awesome but the games leave one wanting.
PS Eyetoy the forgotten Kinect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoJ1ZNYODUg
PS2 Eyetoy Kinetic-sidewinder game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWI06DrU2R0
|
I didnt say that.
Its simpler this way.
Eyetoy reads a 2d mirror image of you.
Kinect reads an entire 3d image of your room and you.
|
As I said...I would expect as much a generation later. Still not much of a difference...and did the Kinect 2 not build off of the same things the Kinect did? Exactly, its called a natural progression. You cannot control 3D space, so that renders it pointless aside from doing the same exact thing the Eyetoy did more accurately. As I said before to someone else the Move solved the problem of controling a 3D world and controling core games that MS will never be able to control until they follow suit....again. I am glad MS came to grips with the fact that Kinect is only good for adding things and not giving a full gaming experience because that whole Kinect for the core campaign was a lie from the start and they knew it.
