SvennoJ said:
sales2099 said:
If its official, I would be most interested in the Sony community reaction. Its not 100%, but some posters here have allready rationalized it and Sony is yet again the good guy for doing exactly what MS is doing.
|
Apples, oranges.
Ps4 Eye won't be required to be always on, there is extremely little chance it will be an integral part of the OS.
Cost wise, Ps eye + Move controller was already a lot cheaper then Kinect. Kinect 2.0 uses more advanced tech, ps4 eye only adds a second cheap webcam and most likely won't ship with a move controller.
We'll know at E3 anyway, then let's start complaining.
I'm more worried about the requirement that every game needs to support remote play. What is that going to do for nice crisp 1080p UI's if they need to work on 960x544. And what about the missing shoulder buttons on Vita. The experience is completely different on 60" or 5".
|
My counter would be why bother. If developers cannot depend on every home having at least one move controller than they pretty much will develop for none. It limits the device and make it so that support will be mininal. One thing I have to give to MS and Nintendo is that they take risk and go all in. They will reap the rewards or burn but at least they do not try to stay in the middle. Sony on the other hand likes to stay safe. They like the middle but it can make so so products because they never commit to them.
