| DirtyP2002 said:
When MS was about to launch the first Xbox, shareholders were quite shocked that it did not run Windows. Just like what happened at Sony, there is always a discussion about the product and its potential before the device is actually released. This day and age, quite a few investors used the Xbox business as a positive example for product launches. |
Problem is we're both right, I was just stating the current issues MS has with a lot of shareholders opposed to Sony. I see your side and I already know about it, I was just talking about it based on historical context. Pachter was even talking about MS and a shareholder whom has a two billion dollar stake in the company, who has zero say in the process on 'Pach Attack'. I've heard a couple shareholder meetings with a lot of older shareholders who cannot stand the way MS is handling the company. Pachter, much like the topic here imagined MS as a side product outside of Microsoft. The only difference between what he said and the topic was whether it would be sold to Samsung, but eh...I think its time to move on from this topic.
