By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TripleMMM said:
Areym said:
TripleMMM said:

I guess you didn't saw my post when I first brought it up, so you don't know other companies are doing this as well...

Oh gosh, I'm sorry. Let me go look at all 12 pages, post by post and get back to you on that, hun.

Also, it doesn't surprise me. My only point is that I think companies are losing touch with what gamers really want, what kind of features they want on their consoles and that just as we sometimes demonize Sony and MS, Nintendo a cheecky little devil. I bet a lot of people would gadly trade some of those social/TV applications from the Xbox one for some bakwards compatability. They are also not very concious of the good that used games or LP can do for them. While it does cost sales and it is a business after all, there can be a lot of potential buyers the next time around.

Compare LP's vs. Nintendo to blocking used games. I see blocking used games is much worse than the LP's bussiness, as I've said before, if Nintendo blocked used games, I'll be the first to say to Nintendo that they can kiss my feces smearing brown buttocks to die-kingdom-come!

I agree indefinetely. I play used games all the time. I don't buy them but I have gamefly and borrowing from friends, so honest kudos to Nintendo for stay off that business. the LP, while not a huge problem, still shows that companies are getting more comfortable and dare I say, slightly greedy with how much they can stretch a fan's loyalty to their console.

I will shamefully admit that I would still purchase a PS4 even if they decide to block/charge for used games but I would not give them a penny from that.Just as I have condemned MS, I would condemn Sony openly if they decide to implement any blocking of used games on their first party titles, probably more so thant third party titles.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian