EA tells Kotaku that it has zero titles in development for the Wii U

[UncleScrooge]

Mazty said:

UncleScrooge said:

 

EA would sacrifice profit because of a meltdown between them and Nintendo. We don't know what caused this therefore actual journalism is needed. Yeah, that's me pointing out a "conspiracy". It's on the same level as UFO sightings or Iluminati taking over the world. Also, it's pretty clear this piece of news gets you pumped up. You're all over it. Why deny it? 

Isn't it pretty ironic that someone who denies businesses are being driven by emotion also denies that they themselves are being driven by emotions even though they clearly are? 

According to whom?! That flies in the face of all business ideas and notions. That makes as much sense as saying 1 in 10 doctors will purposely give you the wrong drugs because they don't like your face...

Here's all the research you need:
http://www.vgchartz.com/tools/hw_date.php
http://kotaku.com/5968909/when-only-42-people-are-playing-madden-on-the-wii-u-its-not-a-sports-console

Bam. Wii U = not profitable for EA. You clearly have done no research and have no idea how companies are ran. Look above. All the evidence a company needs to know investing in the Wii U may not be for them.

According to world history and human behaviour over tens of thousands of years? The history of journalism? Politics? Buckloads of irrational business decisions made over the past few hundreds of years? 

...

Are you an allegory on sarcasm? Seriously now, are you pulling my leg? First you say a doctor ain't gonna give me a wrong diagnosis because he doesn't like my face and then you give me a wrong diagnosis without having seen my face in the first place? You also cited that "business are rational" thing again and then gave me an irrational and emotional response filled with personal insults while claiming to be rational.

This is really cracking me up. (No, I'm not trying to be witty right now, if this is intentional it is genuinely funny and well played).