By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
hasonap on 17 May 2013
Edit Thread
Mazty said:
Mr Khan said:
orniletter said:
and the usual suspects are cheering...expected !

I said before. The people backing EA in this know exactly who they are and exactly what they're doing.

An admission of honesty from them would also be refreshing. "I want to see Nintendo fail and will rationalize third parties' efforts to that end."

Simple, to the point, and we won't have these endless threads that go nowhere fighting all these people with their "rational business" claims.

Your business accumen is clearly wavering and it is wholly sad to see such a snap, baised judgement from a moderator. EA is a company, not a bitter old man with alzheimer's looking for a fight. 

When sales are like this:
http://kotaku.com/5968909/when-only-42-people-are-playing-madden-on-the-wii-u-its-not-a-sports-console

Please explain why EA would continue to develop for a console which clearly is not profitable for them. Or are you claiming a multibillion dollar company has made such a large decision based on irrational decisions, and ones which trump profit? That's not how businesses work....We're talking about EA, not ABC...

Wow, this is really bad for Nintendo - as if we didn't know already -but seriously only 42 players playing!?! I could have sworn that Rainbow six vegas 1 the other day when I played it had at least around 50players playing(360) - a game from 2006!!!

So I guess we have our answer for why EA is doing this: Bad sales, no origin support, personal disagreements and TADA its not worth it anymore