By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaizar said:
zorg1000 said:
Kaizar said:
zorg1000 said:
Yakuzaice said:
Kaizar said:

2008 to 2001 doesn't count. And April is not a marketing month.

And I said Sony & Nintendo, but I guess your browser didn't fully load the page or something.

Why exactly do they not count?  What is the barometer for "doing so good"?  Selling almost as much as one of the 360's worst months ever?  I seem to recall you didn't mind comparisons to previous systems when you would make up numbers about how the 3DS outsold every system after 24 months or whatever.

You said Nintendo, and then I guess you edited the post after I quoted you. 

Kaizar said:

You say it's the games that sale the 3DS, but the 3DS only gotten most of those games because of 3D, otherwise it would have gone to the PS Vita or Home Consoles or never get thought up in the first place, or in the case of Kid Icarus: Uprising, it would have never been rebooted in the first place.

Kaizar said:

HD had never meant anything to consumers. But 3D has meant a lot, as the market shows us each and every time with TVs & Movies & video game systems.

Sales speak for themselves, and no one has ever cared about HD, at least not to more then up to 10% of consumers.

Star Trek Into Darkness is my example of 3D movies, if you want to know what people see in 3D.

Less & less movies are made in 2D and more & more movies are release in 3D. The 3DS gets all the 3rd Party support and also all the 1st Party support. The only thing HD has got is Resident Evil 6 & Final Fantasy 13, I would rather play such new games as Kingdom Hearts 3D & Resident Evil Revelations.

What world are you living in?  You think Nintendo's handheld would have no games if it wasn't 3D?  Besides the fact that it is first party software that is driving sales, why would third parties have made their 3DS games for Vita or consoles if there hadn't been 3D?

What metric shows that 3D means more to consumers than HD?

Sales speak for themselves?  What sales?  Because I'm pretty sure way more than 10% of consumers have purchased HDTV's.  HD consoles sold quite a bit as well, and 3DS sales don't suggest that people love 3D while not caring about HD.

The only third party games HD systems have gotten are RE6 and FF13 while 3DS is getting all the support?  I have to ask again, what planet are you on?  Also both of your "new games" came out around a year ago, and they are both from established franchises.


Im starting to give up on this guy, he never presents proof for his claims and thinks that his opinions are 100% fact. I think 3D is starting to scramble his brain


You never present proof for your claims and you are saying that that's okay.

I can easily say that Color TV has been scrambling everyones brain, but that would be fanboy-ism.

What r these claims im making that u refer to? Your the one that throws out numbers and crazy statements with nothing to back yhem


Your claims are that 3D TVs hasn't sold more then HD TVs during same point in life spam and that the 3DS didn't get such games as Kingdom Hearts 3D & Resident Evil: Mercenaries 3D & Star Fox 3D & Zelda OoT 3D & Cave Story 3D & Super mario 3D land & etc. etc. because of its 3D effect.

I never said 3D tvs didnt sell better, I asked u to provide proof that it did.

The other thing is just plain stupid, half those those games r first party, Nintendo wpuld release them tegardless if they decided to use 3D or not. As for the other games, those developers heavily supported DS so its a given they release games for its successor. No proof is needed as its completely obvious. Claiming things like those games wpuldnt be made if not for 3D requires proof since its so off the wall that it makes no sense.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.