| theprof00 said: pretty sure the press already does that, pretty much every single day. If it's ALL the press you are looking for to criticize him, maybe stop and ask "why does one half criticize him on everything, and the other half criticizes him on important matters that concern them, like the AP?" Is it because they're all paid shills? Or because the shit fox likes to criticize him on is all rubbish, and this other thing is actually important? It's funny how conservatives say that liberals are biased, yet several times, liberals have criticized some such direction or law, while the conservatives criticize every single thing. Maybe the liberals aren't so biased. Maybe we should be looking somewhere else to find the biases. Fox would have me believe that the entire media is obama lovers, and biased shills. Occam's Razor would tell me that issues such as bengazi simply aren't a big deal to the press( or the majority of Americans for that matter; see: election 2012), and some other issues are. |
What am I reading? Did you just have a breakdown of some sort? You sound distraught and rambling.
- Fox News is not half of the press.
- Liberals are biased. Conservatives are also biased. Everyone is biased. I'm not sure where you're even going with that. On that note...
- If the media only cares about the AP because it's something that affects the media, then that doesn't make it the most important story in actual reality. It may or may not be, but that's incidental. That it will probably get the most attention is the result of the media being biased towards stories about the media.
- Benghazi wasn't a big deal to the majority of Americans because the majority of Americans are, to put it very charitably, not well informed. To the extent that they are informed, they're informed by... well, the press.
