Benghazi Hearings is this important?

[Zappykins]

scat398 said:

Zappykins said:

I just can't take you seriously.  You are comparing a grape to 10,000 oranges.  It is insincere.

It's like the person trying to compair this to Watergate!  Do they even have  clue to what Watergate was, abously not.

I don't mean to offend you, but your actions seem like an excellent example the worst part of US policies, blind partisanship.  As I and others have pointed out, you bias is not only showing, but has a spotlight and a Good Year Blimp in LED and 20,000 dancing sparkly outfitted cheerleaders.

But remember, the more you yell and hide, the more seriously people will take you.  If you want to just hate on Obama, it's a free county.  But let's not make up things.

I'm sorry but your comment is out of line.  My question was simply why did the administration lie? They didn't need to.  Even the liberal press is stating this question now, and its a fairly simple question.  

And why you brought up watergate I have no idea, but wire tapping is a big deal and it was very appropriate for the administration to be investigated.  The end of your statement just doesn't make any sense so lets just leave it at you are ok when liberals lie but conservatives is a no go.

I brought up Watergate because someone else in this thread was bringing it up.  They were trying to compare the two, and it seemed absurd.

"..you are ok when liberals lie but conservatives is a no go."

And that is a perfect example of what I said was wrong with US politics.  Certain people have to make every partisan.  It silly, weaken all credibility and makes you come across as paranoid and delusional.

I think is our responsibly to challenge the government when we believe it is out of line.  But if that motivation is more about a political party than an actual issue, then I think it is a incredulous waste of everyone’s time.

I really want to understand you point, I really do.  You have to remember who cut the money the administration wanted, and the warnings about it:

“Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans' proposed cuts to her department would be "detrimental to America's national security" -- a charge Republicans rejected.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dee-evans/benghazi-protests_b_2133162.html

(Its kinda like how they ‘forgot’ that Donald Rumsfeld went to Iraq to negotiate WMD’s with Hessian himself in the 80s’.)