JayWood2010 said:
happydolphin said:
JayWood2010 said:
happydolphin said:
| JayWood2010 said:
Your original argument was not that and you know that. It is very clear that these games are making MUCH more money on the HD twins. Especially considering that they are selling about 5x as much.
And yes thos games was easy money for the wii, but considering they are averaging 600k on a userbase of 100m what do you suppose they are going to sell on a console with a 3m userbase?
If you are going to come in here and act like that maybe you can do the math and tell me this.
|
It doesn't matter what the tie ratio is, that's bad logic.
All that matters is the MONEY. Relative to each source, how much profit is each source making. If the money is not good, then the source is no good. It doesn't matter what the total install base is as that is meaningless you showed that yourself the averages are off.
Profit, that's all you need to worry about.
|
And right now they are not profiting off of the WiiU. Do you think a business would ignore money? I have never seen a worst argument on VGC than what you just gave me.
|
Flip, flop, flippity, flippity flop. At first you talk about the Wii, I tell you about the U, you come back to the Wii, I talk about the Wii, you talk about the U.
|
What are you even talking about? You have said nothing that makes any sense what so ever.
Let me sum this up for you since you are having a hard time with this.
X360/PS3 makes A LOT more money for EA than the Wii.
EA games did not sell well on the Wii.
And at this moment it isnt worth investing some games on the WiiU because they do not sell well on Nintendo consoles with a large userbase, then they definitely will not sell well on one with a small userbase.
|
4m Wii games sold at barely any cost, 18m 360 games at high cost, 12m PS3 games at high cost. Wii = easy profit.
Easy profit = easy logic.
Money talks, you know the rest.
