What gaming company gives you a bitter after taste?

[Michael-5]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Microsoft. They lure you in with games, drop first party then leaving you hanging half way through the gen. Their first party is by far the least reliable out of all the three and their interest in alternative entertainment is alarming to say the least. EA had better games than them yet had a worse reputation.

I 100% agree, 360 was such an awesome system before 2009, and then MS just abandoned the gamers....

Plus the few games we got after that were bi-annual sequels of their big 3 franchises (Halo, Gears, and Forza). I love these IP's, but a new game every 2 years is too much, I don't only play Halo, and the quality IMO has been going downhill in both Gears and Halo since game 1 (Forza 3 was a high point, but now it's downhill too).

This is why I refuse to get a Nextbox until end of life now, MS is not consistant with their projects. How is it that the 360 was leading JRPG's pre-2009, and since then it's basically stopped? Sony has something new every year, and a couple sequels too in case you don't like the new stuff, and Nintendo has at least 1 big game every year, and it's usually something different.

S.T.A.G.E. said:
LOL it's amazing how Sony has the most IP's out yet left the most bitter taste in everyones mouths. Perhaps they should make nothing and rely on others.

I'm wondering how Sony left a bitter taste? Okay Last Guardian might become a PS4 game now (if it releases) and PS3 only got one Gran Turismo (If 6 comes out for PS3, I doubt it will be a PS3 exclusive), but really Uncharted, GT, and InFamous IMO are amazing franchises, and compared to last gen Sony really offered a lot of 1st party support.