| S.T.A.G.E. said:
Sony more than covered their end, they got a healthy dose of third party games that doesnt hamper me from gaming at all. Their ports arent terrible, they just have a possibly worse framerate issue or texture pop-ins but so did the Xbox 360. Depends on the third party game.. The online is not inferior by a longshot any longer, In fact PSN has only grown and offered more to the consumer than the competition, and the online activity in games like COD, Battlefield and FIFA prove its smooth access online is basically equal to the 360 (The 360 downloads a bit faster and thats about all I noticed). Sony has essentially done their part of keeping online gaming playable and free, yet involved themselves in premium service that gives away a heap of games monthly. This is something that no other console can say they get free or even with a monthly fee. If you're a gamer....its kind of obvious where the games are currently whether one likes them or not. The online use is as healthy as ever. I wonder....if their online games content was inferior, how come PSN games have been on GOTY lists outside of their categories? |
@bold. So you haven't yet answered OP, since the PS3 wasn't a good comparison to the U.
What would you do if the PS4 got bad and late ports, rather than the opposite (game being delayed on U to match PS4 schedule, rayman legends).
Would you boycott to the risk of being called a whiney fanboy?
