This is EA thinking we are stupids!

[o_O.Q]

Bong Lover said:

o_O.Q said:

 

"wanted to know if you actually thought you had put forward a reasonable proposition or not"

i wouldn't have posted it otherwise...

 

"original proposition : Nintendo gamers like new and fresh game experiences"

 no... this is what i bolded and addressed with all my posts

"because of the missing audience who prefers original games over the same generic shooter over and over again"

 

anyway very good! i was worried for a minute there

you finally after about 6 posts or so tried to address the point i was making... i'm proud

"For this kind of argument to make rational sense one of these things must be true

• These four games represent the full number of games Nintendo gamers can chose from for their new and fresh experiences (the premise is false)

• Since two franchises have not changed much over 20 years, no other new or fresh games can exsist (Affirming the consequent)"

well no that isn't the case at all i was just providing examples of cases where lilchickens point about EA shooters also in my opinion applies to nintendo fanchises

he seemed to be implying to me that nintendo is only ever original

i never at any point spoke in absolute terms , if i did i wouldn't have chosen a couple examples....

and in case you missed it my overall point was only ever that nintendo isn't always as original as some people claim

thats funny though put words in my mouth then say my argument is weak thats rich lol

Good grief! How is this supposed to make your argument any more solid? It's still based on a logical fallacy, the exact same logical fallacy that I pointed out already.

Anyhow, this is beside the point I was interested in anyway. I guess you have sort of confirmed what I was asking about in the first place, though in the most round about way possible.

Well, that pretty much sums it up for me, feel free to take the last parting shot and you shall have the last word. You can even feel free to convince yourself that you're reasoning is so rock solid that I decided to bail out of the discussion rather than continue the exchange.

"the exact same logical fallacy that I pointed out already"

which logical fallacy are you reffering to? you mean the crap that you claimed i said but never said or implied?

all you did was claim that i said or implied things that i never did... and unfortunately  for you that was the basis of your criticisms up to this point 

in fact you even fucked up before that when you didn't even realise which of lilchickens statements i was reffering to

yet even at this point you don't have the common decency to just admit that you were wrong lol

you really are quite a guy

 

if i misunderstood what you were saying there i'd honestly like to know what logical fallacy you're reffering to...

and please if you do take the time to reply at least make the effort this time to actually reffer to things i've said, not rely on what ever delusions your mind can orchestrate

if you honestly think that examples that i've used like super mario u are actually original then i really am done here