PS3 games and the lack of 1080p

[Linkzmax]

NJ5 said:

ookaze said:

NJ5 said:

For your information, I'm writing this post on a 24'' PC display running at 1920x1200. Regarding your rant about 16:10/16:9, it's irrelevant since I said "higher than 1080p".

 

Come back when you understand what "native resolution" of a monitor means.

I know there are legions of uninformed people like you, which will make stupid things as running at 1920x1200 on a 24" PC display (which can't display this resolution, as it can't pass its native one, it will downscale it), but I thought it was enough to clearly talk about "native" resolution. Guess it wasn't enough. Go educate yourself please before saying more nonsense.

FYI, my 22" CRT can accept even higher resolutions than 1920x1200, which doesn't mean it can display them.

 

If you really want to look like a complete idiot, here you go:

http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetDocument.aspx?docid=0900a5a582102e0c&cc=uk&lc=en

http://reviews.cnet.com/lcd-monitors/hp-lp2465/4505-3174_7-31919307.html

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127277-page,1-c,monitors/article.html

 

Aye, it's pretty well known that 24" is the minimum for PC LCD displays to have a 1920x1200 native resolution.  And when money is of no concern(roughly the price of 1080p TVs), 30" LCD monitors have a 2560x1600 native resolution, which is enough to support 1440p.