Darc Requiem on 21 February 2008
| Goddbless said: By listening to the logic of most posters here it would seem even if MS had 90% of all JRPGs on their console you still would think it senseless to get one. A person can name all the JRPGs currently out for the 360 and someone will just rebuttal with a vague release date of titles that may or may not come out within a year. Some people make it seem like Final Fantasy is the end-all be-all of JRPGs. It would be very interesting to see everyone's stance if Final Fantasy was multi-plat and coming to both 360 & PS3 day an date. Then again they would just say it doesn't belong on the 360 so no one should buy it. Like how some criticize MS for only having 3 or 4 genres supported on their console, but when they try otherwise it's "They should stick to what they know and stop trying to broaden their appeal". Maybe I don't get why MS just doesn't deserve to have a diverse library of games. I don't understand why they should give up and settle for 3rd place. Can someone explain? |
You summed it up perfectly. I went off a few months ago about this issue. Every time an JRPG is announced as exclusive/time exclusive, the thread is filled with PS3 owners saying they will just wait and they will (insert name here) coming in the next few months. Last generation when I had my Gamecube and Dreamcast, I saw that the PS2 was getting all the RPGs and you know what did. I bought a PS2. Crazy idea huh, buying the console that actually has the games you want.
