fillet said:
veritaz said:
fillet said:
veritaz said:
I just checked ign and it has 19 games above an 8 and 29 games 8 and above for the vita if you don't just count retail games.
|
It has 17 games scored 8 and above retail not 19.
Still not a bad number at all. But my point here is that even though most of those are ports, and decent ports at that with a few niggling issues that quite frankly are a given because it's a handheld, the home console versions are getting scored higher.
I mean if the games were literally carbon copies of the home consoles then we wouldn't be buying a PS3/Xbox360 in the first place!
It's more a criticism of IGN than anything, not a serious attack at the Vita so put the shield down.
|
You're right I rechecked and it is 17, I must have counted 2 digital games by accident. Also i didn't say anything remotely to offend you and I completely agreed with you on what you said so that last comment was weird and unnecessary. You should probably put the shield down instead.
|
LOL, yeah you're prolly right there. Sorry, just said it because I really wasn't wanting the thread to go in "that" direction if you get me because it's not a critcism of the Vita but just the review stuff interested me, but yes you're right so my apologies for that.
|
It's alright i understand, what you said completely made sense because when i was reading the review i was expecting like a 8.6 atleast and bam out of no where it was almost a full point lower. The reviews are really inconsistent with the score on vita games and apparently i wasn't the only one because even you and most of the comment section on ign said the same thing.
