Vita games have low review scores therefore the conclusion is that reviewers are biased?
Sorry, but I'm going to need more evidence than that before I conclude that IGN, or reviewers in general are biased against Vita.
As evidence against your argument (that IGN specifically is biased against Vita), there are only 17 Vita games with metacritic scores above 80/100, which is not that many considering
1) Above 8/10 means at least 8.5 out of 10 for IGN, but above 80 means at least 81/100 for metacritic. Of the 17 games above 80, only 7 are 85 or above on Metacritic.
2) Metacritic would have scores for more games.
3) The 10 IGN games are only including "retail games" I looked through the 17 titles and a few of them appeared to be downloadable, not retail. I may be wrong on this, don't yell.
So yeah, IGN = Vita's biggest fans apparently.
Edit: Just realised 1) is not true. I don't really look at review scores ever, so was unaware.
