Not everything that looks good, is good. They didn't "water down" the game to spite you, any changes they made were for a reason - in this case possibly a lack of funding or manpower. (for which you can understandably be upset) Whatever they showed, it obviously didn't work out like they wanted it to, and while you can most certainly hold that against them as a gamer, you can't hold it against them in a court of law. There's a limit to what the law can dictate, and "spare no expense to make great games" isn't something you can legislate. IF Gearbox mishandled funding for the game, then it is up to Sega, not a class-action suit, to pursue legal action. And seeing as Sega is doing nothing, I don't think Gearbox broke any contractual obligations.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
