sethnintendo said:
I had a lot of fun with my GC. Sure it ended in last but Nintendo made decent profit with the GC along with GBA/DS. Xbox might have sold more but they took huge losses. Sony took huge losses with PS3. I'd argue that profit is more important than sales. Nintendo will survive. I can't say the same about Sony or Microsoft game division. If Microsoft wasn't a huge company with deep pockets then they would be bankrupt. |
Well that's the thing. Nintendo said that they make profit with what? One, two, three games bought with each console, they said? They are not making profit with each console as I understand this is the opposite to their approach for previous gens with their previous consoles. Nintendo is in a different situation with the launch of the WiiU than that of the GC. Nintendo took this generation with the approach of the competition that some Nintendo fans have previously criticized: try to absorb loses.
If the WiiU is not making loses with each console sold and if Nintendo has indeed released consoles at a loss before, then someone please clarify with data, as that is how I've known things to be.
What does this mean? That Nintendo is doomed? I don't know. Maybe for sensible people in here I will just say that they may be in a less happy situation.
SxyxS said:
what i don't understand.the wii u has far more power than the 3ds but was hacked in a shorter period.I always thought:the more powerful a system,the harder to hack.Seems I was wrong. |
That is kinda wrong man, and a little far-fetched and shows that you lack actual knowledge of the console development process. We all know that the speed in which a console is hacked depends entirely on the developers' decision of how many mousetraps they put inside the console's box.

Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1







