|
g911turbo said: I don't think you trolling. Although some people on here constantly, underhandedly jab at a certain company and then claim ignorance later. Doing that too much invited the mods to notice - its like throwing a grenade into a room, running away, and then saying "what did I do?" later. Keep it civilized and you'll be ok. That being said the article you provided compared PS4/Nextbox/Wii U. Does not compare Wii to Wii U as you initially made it sound. We'll call it an honest typo. With HW constraints (more memory shuffling, GPU constraints, etc.), I can see how developers would prefer the other two over Wii U. I agree that Wii U price cut might make nintendo bleed a bit. They are probably waiting to see where the other two are priced at. I agree on the software being hard pressed to boost sales minus a few key titles. Mario Kart + advertising + price cut will move many systems. I would bet money on it. I just have a funny feeling that the biggest competitions for ALL 3 systems out of the gate is going to be the current XBOX and PS3. Cheap and have large library of games. AND, still getting developer support through the holidays and maybe into next year. |
Well I just think in June 2012 no developer have access to real PS4/Nextbox... and the Wii U added some hardware modifications that makes the developement more harder than the previous consoles (360 and Wii of course... PS3 is in another level of difficult).
I agree about the 360/PS3 selling over a year of two after the PS4/Nextbox launch but that will not make the first gamers adopter to avoid the new systens.
I had another point against Wii U but that is so personal that I always remove it from these discussions... I can't see (it's me) the purpose of the Pad like a system seller for the casuals... I can see the selling point for the Wiimote but I can't see the same with WiiUPad after used it... it is seens so useless compared to the Wiimote... the Wiimore are something that everyone in the world wants to try... the WiiUPad not.
