curl-6 said:
Kaizar said:
curl-6 said:
Kaizar said:
curl-6 said:
Kaizar said:
Otakumegane said:
It has better shaders, less poly count.
In terms of pure power, 3DS is weaker. (See DKCR being 30FPS on 3DS and 60 FPS on Wii) |
The 3DS has 160 million polygons.
How many triangles could the Wii possibly have?
|
No offense, but I don't think you know what you are talking about.
You claimed the 3DS had an eight-fold CPU advantage over the Wii, and this 160 million numbers smells like more BS.
|
GPU @ 300 MHz has 120 million triangles.
GPU @ 200 MHz has 80 million triangles.
Either way, it seems to put the Wii in its place.
|
The specs say 15 million polygons. Rogue Squadron 3 on the Gamecube, a system weaker than the Wii, pushed 20 million.
|
15.3 million polygons
@ 100 MHz = 40 million triangles
@ 400 MHz = 160 million triangles
800 million pixel performence
@ 100 MHz = 400 million
@ 400 MHz = 1,600 million
I read the entire specs.
|
So in addition to having a lower polygon oputput than the Gamecube, which was in turn weaker than the Wii, thhe 3DS's pixel output was only a little higher than the Gamecube. (648 Megapixels)
The Wii GPU was a 50% increase over the Gamecube, putting it comfortably above 3DS in both polygon and pixel output.
|
Doesn't that mean that the Wii has 40 million triangles?
Well, I know the GPU clock speeds:
Gamecube = 194 MHz
Wii = 243 MHz
3DS = 400 MHz
Plus the Wii looks as small as the 3DS without its disc drive, so I find it hard to believe that the Wii with older Hardware at $250 could have better technology. Why wouldn't Nintendo use better technology in a newer $250 Hardware?
