Witcher 3 Dev: PS4 Is A High End PC, CD Projekt Happy With New Architecture

[eFKac]

KingofTrolls said:

eFKac said:

KingofTrolls said:

So u agree with me - more multiplats, shorter console life cycle. Nothing more to buy a new, good PC.

If you don't care about Sony's first party offerings and ready to invest more than the presumably 400-500$ that PS4 will launch at then probably yes.

Yes and no. I dont wanna pay 1000 $ for PC but also I dont wanna get console with 2 exclusives per year, moreover with shitty graphics. I was excited about PS4 but now I understand what will happen.

Sony 1st party are the best of the rest - but howamy studios Sony get ? ND, SSM, QD. Polyphony will launch Gt7 in 2016. Rest, like Sony Japan et are inferior tier for me. Console without exclusives are empty pack of iron - look at PS Vita. So fckin awesome hardware and nothing to do with it.

You're going to extremes, over-generalising or are ignorant. 

If you don't want to pay 1000$ for a PC then don't count for over the top graphic results from your PC, it definately won't be like night and day compared to the PS4.

Second statement - saying that PS4 will have 2 exclusives per year is simply ignorant buddy, maybe 2 "AAA" exclusives yes, but overall definately more then that and "moreover with shitty graphics" - come on are you serious? Have you seen PS4 games footage? Saying it will have shitty graphics is just stupid, especially since you claimed earlier that because PS360 have so much different architecture they could come with games with amazing graphics like Halo 4, TLoU and Beyond:TS

You asked about Sony first party studios - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCE_Worldwide_Studios here you are. Mind you - some of the studios have more then one team at disposal - Naughty Dog, Santa Monica, Evolution Studios to name a few that are on top of my head so they can develop aproximately double the amount of games. Plus there still are some sort of "2nd party" Quantic Dream that you mentioned, or Insomniac (we may see them back under Sony's wings after the inevitable Fuse fiasco) and many projects that are outsourced to 3rd party studios that are exclusive to Sony platforms.

In your earlier posts you seem to think that PS3 was better with exotic architecture because it therefore provided exclusives over PC due to architecture differences. I say it's bollocks since this gen especially we had way less 3rd party exclusives then before, most due to the fact that development costs are raising and the was no dominating platform (not caounting Wii, since it didn't help it gain 3rd party support) but PS3 especially in it's early days suffered from it's difficult architecture with underperforming ports or being ditched altogether by PC focused or experienced studios. With the PS4 we can be sure that both of those problems will be no more if PS4 goes with a smooth start sales-wise.