Destroying your childhood, Episode 1: Super Mario World

[cyberninja45]

RolStoppable said:

cyberninja45 said:
Hmmmm this kinda resembles my thread that I made about the Legend of zelda. Have you been playing more Playstation again Rol?

OT- The thing about the NSMBWii and U games IMO is that I believe these games are meant to be played as a multi-player experience. Playing nsmbwii multiplayer is one the most fun times I had playing a game this gen, but I would never touch that game single player. This is where the older smb games have the new series beat, that is they their levels are far superior for single player experiences.

As for SMW vs SMB3 that is a tough one as it is hard to say which one is objectively better. For me I prefer SMW because it just has that much more charm in it. The music is better, the sound effects are spot on, the world seems better thought out, the enemies are well created and memorable everything just matches up neatly in the game (and mario eyes are not dots)

I mostly skimmed your Zelda thread, because somewhere in it you admitted to playing the games like only once and you also demonstrated some lack of understanding (don't remember exact details though).

The main problem with labeling NSMBW and NSMBU as primarily multiplayer experiences is that there are quite a few levels where 3+ players guarantees death for at least one player. Do you seriously want to make the claim that Nintendo made such glaring mistakes during development when their games are usually highly polished? It's obvious that the levels were designed for a single player and the multiplayer is the tacked on part. You might also want to come forward and admit that you have yet to play NSMBU in-depth.

At least I was actually trying in my zelda thread, although I admit it was a rushed thread kinda like nsmb2 (joking), you are not even really trying here although people are giving you serious responses. I never said I only played the zelda games once I said I never fully replayed the games, and the type of game zelda is makes the reasons obvious, I'm also sure I showed no lack of understanding.

Also no where in my post I said anything about playing NSMBU. So why would I want to come forward and admit to not playing it in depth?

So what if there are a few levels that guarantee death for a 3rd or 4th  player (actually that was the fun part), the majority of the levels are still better played with more than one player. SMB to SMW probably has some levels which can played with more than one player that doesn't mean the game was meant to played multiplayer. Do you seriously want to make the claim that nintendo devotes a large amount of resources for the NSMB series and never rushes it out to the market?