Slimebeast on 24 April 2013
I am against it for a couple of reasons.
1. It shouldn't be called "marriage", it should be called something else, like "registered partnership" like we have in Sweden. Let the term "marriage" be unique to heterosexual partnerships based on religious and traditional grounds and probably societal grounds (to strengthen the child-nurturing institution that's still important to our society and its stability).
2. It's a hypocritical act. Why only allow homosexual couples to marry but still discriminate other forms of partnerships such as polygamy, siblings wanting to marry a sibling and friends wanting a protected union with several friends?
