kain_kusanagi said:
Considering that in the OP I questioned why Halo was included and Doom was not and why Sonic was absent altogether, I think I made it clear that I don't think the timeline is a complete view of gaming. I do think that people are acting like it's the worst "list" of top gaming stuff just because they couldn't find their favorites on the list. It's a snapshot of where gaming started and its evolution to today. The entries aren't necessarily the most important stuff. The entries are the big ones that regular NatGeo readers will be familiar with. It's not a timeline for super nerd gamers to argue over, it's a brief overview for the average NatGeo reader.
|
Yeah. Not a great list but nothing to get mad about.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/92109/nintendopie/ Nintendopie Was obviously right and I was obviously wrong. I will forever be a lesser being than them. (6/16/13)