J_Allard said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Machiavellian said:
torok said:
CGI-Quality said:
Glass half empty perspective. On the other foot, to some, it must ache, just a tad, knowing that Sony's worst console will still outsell Microsoft's best. |
Yes, that is even more interesting if we look at how bad they managed the PS3 launch and still came a year later. In the end, Sony's totally terrible management of the first 4 years of PS3 (price, launch date, PSN hack) will still beat the best effort MS ever made in consoles.
|
When you really look at it, its not that interesting. Sony sold about 6 mill in Japan where MS does not have a market. That alone gives Sony a huge boost in global sells. Sony also sell in more markets then MS which is also a boost to their total global sells. When the PS3 came out it always sold more than the 360 even with the higher price because of the PS brand. The fact that Sony probably will take 2nd everybody pretty much stated that from the beginning. The difference is that people stated it would be much sooner than 7 years.
If you look at it from MS perspective. The first Xbox was a complete lost finiancially. The 360 also started this way and also had its own troubles but MS was able to tripple the size of its install base. Tripple the size of its online userbase. Start to make a profit on each console and make quite a penny on it online services. Take over 2 major markets from your competitior which is the US and UK. Increase your market share in Europe and sell to other regions.
So while the fanboys can thump their breast at getting 2nd place, as a product I am sure MS is very happy with what the 360 has done and it gives them a competitive chance to battle Sony PS brand without having to rush to market.
It seems people always takes this narrow view that who sales the most console is the winner but in reality, its a much longer war. I am sure a company wants to continue to move forward than go one step forward then 2 steps behind only to have to play catch up again.
|
Yeah, lets take out Japan to favor MS. While we are at it lets take out US too because that favors MS... and hell... why not take out everything else because that favors one of the other too... That line of thinking is absolutely ridiculous. It isn't Sony's fault that MS can't gain traction in Japan. Just like its not MS' fault Sony didn't get as popular in the US.
Also, MS was out to take over the PS3. They even said thats what they were targeting at the begining of the gen. Sure 360 was a success and MS can be happy about it. However, they failed to obtain something they wanted. That has to be upsetting to some degree.
|
It's hilarious when people compare the advantage the 360 has in the US to the disadvantage the 360 has in Japan.
In Japan the 360 faces a huge cultural disadvantage right off the bat. In the US the 360 is not even the #1 console, a Japanese console is. Last gen the Xbox sold even less in Japan than the 360. Last gen you'd have to combine the GCN and Xbox US numbers together and then double them to reach what the PS2 did in the US. Yeah, they are entirely the same thing LOL.
Also, MS's goal was to stop Sony from taking over the living room with the Playstation. They have succeeded.
|
nothing in this blabbling nonsense is there a lol worthy comment
