By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DevilRising said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Right now I am in the Sony wheelhouse. They make more varied games for the 20+ age group and various ones at that with free online and all the support anyone could ever ask for. They also dont put multimedia before games. It is truly the gamer choice to go Sony. They are basically the median between where Nintendo and Microsofts heads are at, which means offering wise I stand to gain more from them.


There's nothing wrong with your statement except for the "more varied games for the 20+ age group" comment.

This notion was old back during the SNES/Genesis days. There are certainly many games that kids shouldn't be playing (that includes FPS games in my humble opinion). But when it comes to full grown ADULTS? The only way someone has a maturity issue, is IF they feel there is some game that they're "too old for". If you enjoy something you enjoy it, period.


The PS3 is played by a steader group of older gamers who who actively buy the console for all intended purposes. It was the first steady multimedia choice before the Xbox came and it delivered all the hit titles one could want. Nintendo has always had the stigma of being the kiddy console and they will always have it, unless they change their outlook on pro children and families. Sony titles tend me be more mature in style and direction aimed at an older audience. Their shooters have more mature content. Microsofts shooter in Halo appeals to kids with its Sci-fi art style which appeals can appeal to teenagers to adults. Hell even kids want to play COD today. That game sells like hot cakes and its mostly kids buying that.