Real or not, Jesus is the most influencial Human in history! If you deny that you are lying to yourself-

[Slimebeast]

Mazty said:

chriscox1121 said:

Mazty said:

chriscox1121 said:

LOL, Constantine did not organize the bible to be written.

Sure?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty_Bibles_of_Constantine

L2research. 

you send me a wikipedia link and tell me "L2research"? OK.  Anyways, your wikipedia source is only claiming that he ordered 50 copies to be produced from the copies that were already in existence.  According to the one source (Eusebius) it was for the use at constanople and the other new churches that were being established.  It doesn't have anything to do with him writing the bible as you claimed.  The "bible" was not even canonized at the time.  You made a very big claim that he wrote the bible, which is completely false.  

If you don't know how to use a referenced page, than that is your problem, not mine. If you find issues with those reference, then fair enough. But until you do, then it's a good source for an online debate. By writing the Bible I mean he compiled it (him and others) - he didn't go Joseph Smith on it. The fact is though that the first Bible's weren't recorded until about ~300 years after the given events so that should bring into doubt the validity of the stories which would have changed as they had been passed on generation to generation. 

Where on earth did you read that nonsense?

The New Testament

The following table gives the most widely accepted dates for the composition of the New Testament books, together with the earliest preserved fragment for each text.

Book	Dates determined by scholars	Earliest Known Fragment
Gospel of Matthew	60-85 CE[10]	𝔓104 (150–200 CE)
Gospel of Mark	60-70 CE	𝔓88 (350 CE)
Gospel of Luke	60-90 CE	𝔓4, 𝔓75 (175–250 CE)
Gospel of John	80-95 CE	𝔓52 (125–160 CE)
Acts	60-90 CE	𝔓29, 𝔓45, 𝔓48, 𝔓53, 𝔓91 (250 CE)
Romans	57–58 CE	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
Corinthians	57 CE	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
Galatians	45-55 CE	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
Ephesians	65 CE	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
Philippians	57–62 CE	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
Colossians	60 CE +[citation needed]	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
1 Thessalonians	50 CE[2]	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
2 Thessalonians	50-54 CE[11][12]	𝔓92 (300 CE)
Timothy	60-100 CE[citation needed]	Codex Sinaiticus (350 CE)
Titus	60-100 CE[citation needed]	𝔓32 (200 CE)
Philemon	56 CE[citation needed]	𝔓87 (3rd century CE)
Hebrews	63-90 CE[citation needed]	𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)
James	50-200 CE[citation needed]	𝔓20, 𝔓23 (early 3rd century CE)
First Peter	60-96 CE[citation needed]	𝔓72 (3rd/4th century CE)
Second Peter	60-130 CE[citation needed]	𝔓72 (3rd/4th century CE)
Epistles of John	90-110 CE[13]	𝔓9, Uncial 0232, Codex Sinaiticus (3rd/4th century CE)
Jude	66-90 CE[citation needed]	𝔓72 (3rd/4th century CE)
Revelation	68-100 CE[citation needed]	𝔓98 (150–200 CE)

As you can see, the majority of NT books were written 30-60 years after the death of Jesus, and the apostle Paul even started to write his letters to the young Christian churches around the world in less than 20 years after Jesus. About this there is no debate, science is settled on this matter.

The canon and its development - namely the question of which already existing Christian writings were seen as inspired or not is an entirely different thing. But the canonization process was quite robust long before emperor Constantine, as evident from the writings of the first Christian Church fathers around 150-200 AD that show that there was agreement about the majority of the books, but at that time there was still some dispute about a few of the books on wether they could be considered authentic and/or inspired (and for those particular books there still is dispute to this day about their authenticity).

Constantine had little, if any, influence on the canonization process.