By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kynes said:
kowenicki said:
Talal said:
kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:
lol I read the comments here now...

The people are confusing bottleneck with max performance of a system.

Every system has a peak performance even if is don't have a bottleneck... the system can be balanced to have max performance for all component at the same time without generate any bottleneck.

If a component reach 100% (max performance) then there is no bottleneck holding it... the bottleneck happen when a component don't permit another component to reach 100%.


Excellent, thats great news.  You are saying that there is no bottleneck, the sytem is perfecly balanced in every single detail. So the sytem will be able to be fully utilised quite easily and very early then, with zero problems and with zero compromises.

I look forward to revisiting this thread within a matter of months.


Why do you have to be like that? He's just explaining what the article said.

Like what?  I am saying thats great that it is so perfectly and amazingly balanced at such a great price.  One wonders why it didnt already exist?  My second point is that this thread will serve as a great reference point as to if this is correct or not.

Do not worry about this, on five or six years they will say that the PS4 was an unballanced machine, and the PS5 will be the next great thing. I remember what was said about the PS3 not so long time ago.

"The ps3 has no memory issues, Bethesda is just not able to program for ps3."