By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kynes on 07 April 2013
Edit Thread
Sal.Paradise said:
Kynes said:
It's ironic how the tides have turned. Last generation the unified pool of GDDR memory was the evil by sony fanbase standards, and now it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. The flip flopping is amusing.

I guess I need to copy paste what I said to you before, because you obviously didn't get it. 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5173834

I'll get to my point, which is that I think you're bringing up demons from the past to try to paint current Sony enthusiasts on the site in a bad manner, which is quite disingenuous. If you mention that some people are being hypocritical in their behaviour or just acting a certain way, I feel you should at least back it up with some evidence, or it just results in you incorrectly labelling a whole group of people  currently using the site as something they are not. Which isn't a nice thing to do. 

People still defending Cell? Just the post before this one.

NYCrysis said:
First of all the cell wasn't rubbish. In 06 it was much better for gaming than any processor at the time. The cell is like a mix of a cpu and gpu. If the cell evolved using moore's law then it would be one hell of a chip. Imagine the physics it could have accomplished. However that would have been way too expensive. And unfortunately cell is done.

Ask Ethomaz what he thinks of Cell, XDR or anything of the PS3 architecture, he will praise it and at the same time he will praise the PS4 architecture, and is not something only Ethomaz does. CGI Quality praised the PS3 architecture, logic56 did it, and ask Pezus what he thinks of the PS3 hardware. One minute before the PS4 rumors the PS3 was the best possible console by a mile for the PS nation, and now it's something very different to it, and it's curious that now that Sony has taken an approach very similar to the one MS took when they designed the XBox360, it's the best way to design consoles.