Kynes said:
Sal.Paradise said:
Kynes said:
Sal.Paradise said:
Kynes said:
We have some people here who defend anything that Sony does, whatever is the result. The same people who defended Sony decisions on PS3 (Cell and Blu Ray) and now are defending Sony decisions on PS4 (Off the shelf components and PC-lite architecture), and are the same people who don't want anyone to remember them that Sony misbehaves have consequences. They are the same people who want more powerful hardware at cheaper prices, the ones out of touch, and anyone who remembers them this is a hater and harsh. Living in a bubble won't change the reality.
|
Is there anyone here still that defends the cell, aside from possibly turkish?
|
Now it's not the time to defend the cell, when even Sony has publicly accepted during the PS4 event that it was an horrible decision.
|
Hmm, ok I'll rephrase.
Was there anyone here, just before "Sony....publicly accepted during the PS4 event that it was an horrible decision." that defended the cell, aside from possibly turkish?
|
Of course there were. Ask on this forum the technical reason why some people consider PS3 more powerful than XBox360, and most people will say Cell. People won't talk about it, because its past it's time, but most still believe it and said it whenever we had a technical thread.
|
But saying 'the cell is the reason why PS3 is more powerful than 360' and 'defending the inclusion of the cell in PS3' are very different things. And I think you know that because you didn't answer my question directly.
I'll get to my point, which is that I think you're bringing up demons from the past to try to paint current Sony enthusiasts on the site in a bad manner, which is quite disingenuous. If you mention that some people are being hypocritical in their behaviour or just acting a certain way, I feel you should at least back it up with some evidence, or it just results in you incorrectly labelling a whole group of people currently using the site as something they are not. Which isn't a nice thing to do.
