timmah said:
The fact that you think higher gamma means 'more lighting' says a lot about your understanding of the subject. I can't understand why you're on such a bizarre internet campaign to diss the WiiU, why don't you find a positive outlet for your energy, like actually going on boards about your console of choice and saying positive things? Your signature is pure flamebait (not to mention mis-information) anyway, and your only purpose here seems to be to constantly deride Nintendo's hardware... I just don't get it. |
the gamma difference brings out better lighting, based on the video because that lighting stands out more, thats the only thing i noticed that looked better in the comparison video, along with some textures looking better in the wiiu version during cutscenes but i can post many pics of ps3 vs 360 comparsisons where the 360 version looks much sharper and makes the ps3 version look blurry while need for speed wiiiu, they look the same with wiiu having a few more high resolution textures that are very hard to notice because of the post processing out put and the 720p out put, and about me putting down i'm not. my sig states, it could be 160sp, and many people think this condering a 320sp pc parts destroys 360/ps3 and a new 160 sp part can stand toe to toe and even beat them in some games. thing is i was bashed on this forum for stating my opinion on what the wiiu will sell and its power, i think its a few memembers that take this too seriously, where just talking about sales, games hardware, what's the problem exactly, why does what i think or say get to you guys.
