| Porcupine_I said: I believe Schultz was a pragmatic man, and he had never been that closely involved with slavery before, and he was obviously disgusted by the situation and of course he didn't like Candie and he had probably decided that that man should die since the incident with the dogs. So my explanation is that killing Candie was a spontanious descision to shorten the process. He basically got upset by Candie to the point where he decided to do it there and then, without waiting and going through the hassle of concocting another plan. He knew it was wrong, and he knew he would die, that was why he apologized, but he just didn't want to wait any longer, because he probably thought it would be hard to get to him again once they had left. |
This harmonizes with the above posts and at the same time brings me to another point. When Django and Schultz are discussing the plan to get to the plantation and rescue Broomhilda, Schultz says that getting her out of there is not like going for a bounty, Candie is not sought after as a fugitive, so they need to approach the plan differently, not just enter and kill everyone.
Being a bounty hunter, Schultz knew the consequences of killing Candie, he would have a warrant on his head and being a bounty hunter he may have had a clear idea of what killing a man like Cnadie implied and maybe he opted in that very moment to not live a life as a fugitive. So he allows himself to eat them bullets. He gets himself killed. He opted for that fast solution and may have told to himself: "Fuck all this, I am just gonna erase that fucking smile off his face." So he may have indeed allowed himself to be carried out by the feelings of that very moment and embraced the consequences of it all at the same time. Makes sense to me.
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1
