By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
enditall727 said:
curl-6 said:
enditall727 said:
curl-6 said:
enditall727 said:

then why would you try to sell Starfox Adventures short by trying to say that you only put cogs into the slots and what not? like you can't be fucking serious with that..

 

the combat didn't break the flow

 

at the end of the day,  the flight segments wer still better

- Because it's a prime example of why Adventures' puzzles fall short.

- I'd say having to stop and fights guys in tedious 1v1 breaks the flow.

- I'm gonna disagree; the worlds of Banjo et al were built with flight in mind and in a hand-crafted way. By comparison, the flights in Adventures were just a repetitive jumble of asteroids, items, and simple enemies.

Try not to take it so personally, I just have a different opinion on a game to you.

it falls short because there are times where you put a cog in a slot? how does that make it fall short?

 

it doesn't break the flow at all

 

nah the flight segments in Starfox were better than in Banjo Kazooie

 

i'm just trying to understand your reasoning

No, it falls short bcause the puzzles aren't clever.

Stopping to engage a group one at a time certainly breaks the flow, it slows things down too  much in addition to just being boring.

In BK flight took place in organic environments designed around it. In Adventures, it took place in shot, overly simplistic mishmashes of a few basic objects.


hmm..

 

idk what to think about what you're saying because you basically attempted to lie a few posts back

 

it seems more that you having something against this game because it was "Starfox Adventures" instead of being "Starfox 64" on gamecube


How did I lie?

And I enjoyed many games like structures similar to Adventures, like RARE's N64 collectathons and Zelda. I've also enjoyed many games that deviate from their predecessors, like Resident Evil 4 and Yoshi's Island. I just didn't find Adventures to be well made at all, outside of its flashy graphics.


you tried to imply that the cog in the slot thing was the only thing you do in Starfox Adventures. It is horribly obvious that an individual saying something like that DIDN'T play the game. You then admitted that you beat the game. It is also obvious that you would know DAMN WELL that putting a cog in a slot is not the only thing you do if you've REALLY played and beat the game. This makes it obvious that you went out your way to say some out-of-the-way shit about Starfox Adventures for some strange reason

 

So you either just simply DIDN'T play this game or you actually did play it but then LIED to make your reasoning seem more believable

 

I also cannot believe that somebody actually tried to imply that the combat in previous games like Banjo Kazooie and Donky Kong 64 was superior to the combat in Starfox Adventures

.....

 

there are just no words for that

 

 

and you're also complaining about the flight sections in this game. Like DUDE THIS IS NOT STARFOX 64!! I dont understand why people dont understand that. Why cant people just appreciate the fact that Rare still thought about the older fans when trying to add that small element to the game even though it was an Adventure entree to the franchise.

 

There was nothing wrong with the flight segments in that game. They were placed perfectly and at the right times during the game