gum said:
pokoko said:
1/ That doesn't make much sense. What is the point of a headstart if you hang about the starting gate?
2/ I've seen this before and it might or might not be true. Either way, it's a bad, bad idea. You don't let your console languish and then say, "oh, hey, we did it to give the third parties a chance." No. What you do is to force them to put their games on your console. How do you accomplish that? You build up an installed base at all costs. You make it so you cannot be ignored. All Nintendo has done so far is to give publishers and developers a reason to start working on other projects, as they don't consider the Wii U installed base to be significant.
3/ Again, awful idea. It negates that headstart we've been talking about. Release your big guns before the other guys when you have zero competition. Both the PS4 and 720 are going to sell out at launch! They will, absolutely. There is no gain from going head-to-head with them. Get your shots in before the other guys can respond.
Also, I agree with Tachikoma. You come across as somewhat hypocritical when you doom the Vita in the same breath that you ask people to stop dooming the Wii U.
|
It would have been better if they uses their headstart better in order to have a biggest advantage against the next bunch of consoles. Still we are discussing about how much an advantage they will have against the competition. And again this won't be negligible if PS4 and 720 don't sell significantly better than PS3 and 360 did.
Again I have no problem with people saying a console is doomed, this of course can certainly happen and stating it can't based on no argument is certainly the way a fanboy taht don't want to face the truth would react. The problem I have is about the fact than none of the arguments stating the Wii U is in a bad position right now stand imo and I have tried to prove that with arguments. You can agree with those arguments or not but you can't say I haven't given some.
|
But your arguments in defence are nothing more than speculation, no more solid than the comments about the wiiu that got your panties in a twist in the first place, and by twisting the agenda away from giving solid, factual reasons why people shouldn't be pessimistic, you simply resorted to being pessimistic about the vita and telling us we shouldnt compare the two, without really giving a solid reason for why we shouldnt, or why the vita is "more doomed" and the wiiu?
Do you actually know what hypocrit means?
