Michael-5 said:
curl-6 said:
Michael-5 said:
curl-6 said:
How did I lie?
And I enjoyed many games like structures similar to Adventures, like RARE's N64 collectathons and Zelda. I've also enjoyed many games that deviate from their predecessors, like Resident Evil 4 and Yoshi's Island. I just didn't find Adventures to be well made at all, outside of its flashy graphics.
|
Did you like Assault or the Original?
I hated Assault, I felt it was too dumbed down, but I liked the original. I wish Starfox 2 had released here.
|
Assault was really bland and lacklustre to me.
The SNES original is amazing, it's a really underrecognized game in my book. I actually prefer it to Starfox 64.
And Starfox 2 is superb, it's criminal that it was never released. You can find a beta of it ROM online that's playable start to finish, though still a tad buggy.
|
I gotta give the originals more of a chance. I played them well after 64, and the simple answer is they are hard. Fun hard though.
I've played Starfox 1 and 2 for the SNES, but never completed either (mostly because 64 is a remake of 1). I should give them a try again.
BTW, I still liked Starfox Adventures. It was different, and one of Rare's last great games.
|
I played the original on SNES before the N64 even came out. I like its old-school hardness, and that so many little things about it were cooler than SF64; your teammates actually died instead of just dropping out for repairs, making saving them more important. Levels like Macbeth and Fortuna were a lava cave and a varied dinosaur-and-dragon-ruled landscape instead of just a factory planet and a snowball respectively. The music was more epic. Slippy didn't sound so annoying.
I personally see Adventures as the beginning of the end for RARE, but to each their own.
