ironmanDX said:
walsufnir said:
ironmanDX said:
walsufnir said:
ethomaz said:
foodfather said:
For 360 owners, install the game. No framerate issues at all. Its best best version on consoles. |
Not when the PS3 have the most responsive controls during intense fire fights where quick reactions count.
That is the DF conclusion "The more responsive PS3 game gets the nod for delivering a more consistent, flowing gameplay experience. The addition of tearing isn't particularly attractive, but the extra controller response is preferable during intense combat scenes."
|
Sadly they didn't tell us if they installed the game on 360. I remember some comparisons from lensoftruth.com where this also happened ("360-version has worse textures").
|
To do a fair comparison they wouldn't install it. They have to see it working in a way that can suit everyone. No everyone has a hdd to install multiple games on the 360 were the ps3 comes with bigger hdd's to make up for the mandatory installs on most if not all games this late into the gen.
|
what about people with this? 
It takes GT5 to make it useless for other games with mandatory installs.
|
Out of 75ish million consoles sold how many do you think are 12gb versions? They went with the majority, like anyone with a shred of intelligence would.
A good percentage of the 12gb models have probably been installed with hdd's anyway. My mate's ylod and he did the obvious.
|
I don't know how many do but there a lot of them available on amazon.de, for example: http://www.amazon.de/PlayStation-Konsole-DualShock-Wireless-Controller/dp/B00B4RLJ9O/ref=sr_tr_sr_1?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1364816773&sr=1-1 so I guess people buy these a lot (they are also cheaper, of course). You can't talk this off when pushing me to provide data. How many put an hdd in their ps3 is also unknown.
And please stop to argue with "anyone with intelligence" - this is nonsense, yet popular in people's argumentations, especially when they think their own decision was intelligent.
